THE EARLY
HISTORY OF MANCHESTER.
AN ADDRESS
DELIVERED IN
MUSIC HALL, MANCHESTER, VT.,
ON
MONDAY EVENING, DECEMBER 27, 1875.
BY
LOVELAND MUNSON,
OF MANCHESTER.
JOURNAL PRINT
MANCHESTER, VT.
1876.
INTRODUCTORY.
In response to an invitation of many citizens of Manchester, the following address was delivered before the inhabitants of the town. After its delivery, a resolution was adopted requesting its publication. That request is now complied with; in the hope that the address may, in a published form, more fully subserve its immediate purpose, and perhaps aid some future laborer in the rich field of our local history. This review of early times, compressed within the limits of an evening's entertainment, and published substantially as delivered, is of course but an incomplete account of the period to which it relates, and can in no sense supply the want of a town history. But, although the scope of the work is very limited, every effort has been made to secure historical accuracy -- with what success future examination and criticism can best determine. None but those who have tried the task can fully understand the difficulty of a work of this kind, undertaken at so late a day, and after so long a period of general apathy on the subject. I had fortunately preserved some memoranda of conversations had with the late Judge Pettibone not long before his death; and a few manuscript pages concerning the early history of the town, evidently prepared in the later years of his life, were
iv
kindly furnished me by his family. The account of Manchester written by Henry E. Miner, Esq., fifteen years ago, and published in the Vermont Quarterly Gazetteer, has preserved some traditions which might otherwise have been lost. I am under obligations to the Hon. E. P. Walton, of Montpelier, for many valuable suggestions. I am also indebted for assistance to Ex-Gov. Hall, Hon. R. S. Taft, H. A. Huse, Esq., State Librarian, James S. Peck, Adjutant and Inspector General, and Chauncey Smith, Esq., of the Post Office Department at Washington.
ADDRESS
The inhabitants of Manchester have suffered the hundredth anniversary of its organization to pass without notice. Its second centennial, no one now present can hope to see. The last survivor of those whose memory reached back to the early clays of the township, has already passed away. A few decades more, and there will be no one living who ever heard a tale of the olden times from the lips of actor or witness. If the matters of local interest, now resting in tradition, are to be given a permanent and reliable form, the work must be done by this generation. Should these traditions be left to pass into uncertainty and oblivion, those who come after us will know little of the early history of their town, beyond what can be gathered from the public records and the general history of the state. Of that more interesting portion of a local history which is seldom written by contemporary pen, we have already lost too much; and unless something is done to gather and preserve the fragments that remain, it will soon be impossible to present anything like a vivid picture of the Manchester of our fathers. That task I do not undertake to-night. I shall be content if, in the use of such material as is convenient to my reach, I can perform the humbler service of awakening new interest in the history of our town, to the end that some other and
6
better historian may be encouraged by your sympathy to do full justice to
the theme.
In August, 1761, two months after the settlement
of Bennington, Governor Wentworth, of New Hampshire, granted a tract of land
six miles square, within the supposed limits of that province, and incorporated
it into a township by the name of Manchester. The original proprietors,
residents of New Hampshire and Massachusetts, obtained their grant for purposes
of speculation, and awaited the application of any who might desire to settle
in the township. Their acquisition remained in their hands without improvement,
and probably without inspection, until some two years after the date of their
charter, when an incident occurred which led to the purchase of their rights
and the speedy settlement of the town.
A party of explorers from Amenia, in Dutchess
county, New York, while visiting the present locality of Salem in that state,
were attracted by the highland to the east, and turned their steps in that direction
to obtain a better view of the surrounding country. They pursued their
course from summit to summit until they stood upon the top of a lofty mountain
between whose base and the range beyond was a broad and apparently level valley.
Descending the mountain side, they gave the valley a closer examination to ascertain
its advantages as a place of settlement. They returned home with impressions
sufficiently favorable to lead to an inquiry after the owners of the land; and
a few months later we find nearly all the rights of the original proprietors
of Manchester held by residents of Amenia and vicinity.
The first recorded meeting of the proprietors
of the
7
township was held at Amenia in February, 1764. Samuel Rose, the pioneer
of our settlement, was chosen moderator, and Jonathan Ormsby, proprietors' clerk.
Other meetings were held soon after, at which there seems to have been considerable
difficulty in securing the prompt attendance of the proprietors. On one
occasion, it was voted that any proprietor not present at the hour named for
the next meeting should pay a bowl of punch. It may perhaps be conjectured
that many of the proprietors were behind the hour, and that too much punch was
paid for the good of the proprietors' clerk; for he has given us no account
whatever of the proceedings of that meeting. The space which was left
to receive the record is a blank to this day.
Early in May, 1764, a committee of the proprietors
visited Manchester to lay out the first division of lots. There was at
that time no settlement on the west side of the mountain north of Arlington.
Having ascertained the boundaries of their township, the committee proceeded
to lay out sixty-eight lots of one hundred acres each, which were afterwards
assigned by lot to the different rights. The section thus divided extended
nearly from the northern to the southern line, and embraced more than one-third
the width of the town. The present villages of Manchester and Factory
Point are located on that division.
The first settlement in Manchester was made in
the summer or fall of 1764, in that part of the town now known as the Purdy
district. The first house was built by Samuel Rose, on the premises long
occupied by John S. Pettibone. It is believed the houses built in 1764,
were permanently occupied the same year; but possibly the settlers, after completing
their buildings, returned to Amenia for the winter, and first brought their
families to the township
8
in the spring of 1765. Of the precise time of their arrival, of the
number of families that came together, of the circumstances which attended their
journey and settlement, there is no record or tradition.
In December, 1764, the proprietors voted to have
a highway laid out through the town, and Jeremiah French and Gideon Ormsby were
appointed a committee for that purpose. This road was undoubtedly surveyed
in the spring of 1765, and some labor was probably expended upon it the same
year. Its general location was that of the present road from the Judge
Pettibone place to the village, and thence past the Wheaton house to South Dorset.
It was the first road made in the settlement, and was known on the records
for several years as " the main road through the town."
And now, as the settlement is approaching its
second winter, let us briefly consider its appearance and condition. Winding
around the base of the west mountain, far above the low lands of the river valley,
is the newly established road. It is as yet nothing but a rude path, running
among the stumps and trees. At intervals along this road, and in its vicinity,
are the little clearings of the settlers, scarcely perceptible in the unbounded
forest. In the south-west part of the town are the log-houses built by
the settlers of the previous year. These are now doubtless furnishing
temporary shelter to the families of settlers recently arrived, whose own houses
are not yet completed. Those whose buildings are already finished and
occupied are hard at work clearing land for the crops of the coming year. Perhaps
as many as fifteen stalwart men have brought their families and effects to Manchester,
and commenced their chosen task of converting a section of
9
the wilderness into a cultivated farm. We shall find the names of some
of them in the record of the first town meeting held the following spring.
The town was organized on the second Tuesday of
March, 1766. Benjamin Johns was the first moderator, and Stephen Mead
the first town clerk. Eliakim Weller, Benjamin Purdy, James Mead, Ezra
Mead and Samuel Soper, were among the residents at that time. Benjamin
Purdy, Jr., Gideon Ormsby, William Emes, Charles Bullis and Thomas Soper, had
already settled in town, or did so soon after. Benjamin Johns removed to Clarendon
in 1768, but resumed his residence here after an absence of several years. Stephen
Mead located on the premises now owned by William A. Purdy, but a few years
later he conveyed to Thomas Barney, a son-in-law of Gov. Chittenden, and removed
to Pittsford. Benjamin Purdy settled on land which has always remained
in the possession of his descendants, and is now occupied by Daniel Purdy. Gideon
Ormsby located on the premises afterwards owned by Gov. Skinner, and still known
by his name. Eliakim Weller built where the house of Joseph I. Sheldon
now stands, and was probably the first inn-holder in town. James Mead
invested largely in Manchester lands, but soon removed to Rutland, where he
became a prominent man in the affairs of the Grants.
The settlers of Manchester had scarcely commenced
to clear their lands when they learned that the New Hampshire titles were likely
to be seriously called in question. They had purchased their rights in
ignorance of any adverse claim on the part of New York, and were contemplating
an early removal to the town, when the pretensions of that province were formally
announced by a proclama-
10
tion of its executive. The fears and doubts excited by that document
were, however, soon dispelled by a counter proclamation of Gov. Wentworth, and
the settlement of the town was undertaken without delay. The king's order
placing the territory now known as Vermont under the jurisdiction of New York,
was promulgated a few months later; but the settlers did not at first suppose
that that order could receive any construction which would affect existing rights.
Deriving title from a royal charter, issued by the governor of a province whose
jurisdiction of the territory had long been recognized, they could not readily
believe that the subsequent recognition of the conflicting claim of another
province would ever be suffered to imperil their homesteads. But it soon
became apparent that the authorities of New York proposed, not only to assume
jurisdiction of the territory, but to regrant the lands previously disposed
of by New Hampshire, and drive out the settlers already in possession.
In May, 1765, Lieut. Gov. Colden issued the patent
of Princeton, which was the first grant made by New York in conflict with the
previous charters of New Hampshire. It extended along the valley of the
Battenkill from Arlington to Dorset, embracing all the land of any value in
the township of Manchester. Under this patent, Attorney General Kempe
of New York, James Duane, a distinguished lawyer of New York city, and Walter
Rutherford, a merchant of the same place, claimed to own the lands which the
settlers of Manchester had bought, paid for and improved.
Other settlers were placed in the same unfortunate
situation by this and similar patents, and the towns united in various efforts
to avert the impending danger. In
11
December, 1765, the settlers sent a committee to New York to present their
case to the governor and seek relief. One of the committee was Jeremiah
French, a large owner of rights in Manchester, and then or soon after a settler
in the town. In November, 1766, the inhabitants of Manchester, together
with their brethren of other towns, petitioned the king for a confirmation of
their titles. Three years later, a committee of the settlers, of which
Benjamin Purdy was a member, petitioned the governor of New Hampshire to interpose
with the crown in their behalf.
These various appeals of the New Hampshire grantees
produced no decisive results. The New York parties continued to assert
their claims, and in some instances made actual attempts to dispossess the settlers.
Certain lands in Manchester having been awarded the New York claimants
by the courts of that state, an effort was made in the winter of 1770-71, to
put the successful litigants in possession. Ten Eyck, sheriff of Albany
county, accompanied by Munro, the noted Yorker of Shaftesbury, and a small party
of men, visited the premises of Samuel Rose in his absence, and got possession
of the house. Seeing the neighbors approach in force, the sheriff thought
best to retire, having first directed Mrs. Rose to hold possession for the plaintiffs.
This was followed by a more warlike attempt in Bennington, in which the defeat
of the New York sheriff and his posse was not less complete.
Meanwhile the settlers, confident of ultimate
success, have continued to clear and improve the lands in question. Emigration
and settlement under the New Hampshire title have steadily gone on, in spite
of the hostile attitude of New York. Our own town has received its share
in the general increase of population, and there are now scattered
12
clearings in almost every part of the valley. The northern forest has
been penetrated by hardy emigrants, and the old highway through Manchester has
become a part of the road which leads from Bennington to the new settlements
on the Otter creek and the shore of the lake.
We shall better understand the growth of Manchester
during these years if we describe, by names of our own time, the location of
two roads which date from this period. In 1768, a road was laid, extending
in a northerly direction from the south-east part of the valley, passing west
of the hills which rise from the west bank of the Battenkill, to the bridge
at Factory Point, and thence to the premises of E. B. Smith. The central
portion of this road has long been discontinued. In 1769, a road was laid
by a line of marked trees from the bridge at Factory Point to the Deacon Ames
place, and thence over the hill towards Barnumville. Portions of that
road are now embraced in the main street of Factory Point.
Among those who arrived in Manchester during this
period were some who afterwards became prominently connected with our local
affairs. In March, 1769, the name of Martin Powel appears for the first
time in the record of town proceedings. While yet a resident of Amenia
he purchased the lots which are now the farm of Noble J. Purdy, and there was
doubtless his place of settlement. There are indications, however, that
a few years later he kept a tavern stand where the village is now located, on
premises owned by William Marsh. Marsh has been considered one of the
earlier settlers, but his name does not appear in the records of the town until
1770.
As early as 1771 a few framed houses were to be
seen -- low buildings, with huge timbers and immense chimneys,
13
which in our day would be considered anything but elegant, but which, to those
who moved into them from the hastily constructed log-house, seemed quite palatial.
The first framed house in town was built by Samuel Rose in 1769. Its location
was on the side of the hill, a few rods north of the present school-house in
the Purdy district. It remained standing until a comparatively recent
period, and a rough inscription on a stone in the chimney preserved the date
of its construction.
Nearly all who had settled in Manchester up to
this time came from Amenia in New York, while the settlers of neighboring towns
were mainly from Massachusetts and Connecticut. In view of this circumstance,
some have expressed surprise at the perfect accord which always existed between
the early settlers of Manchester and the inhabitants of the towns around.
It must be remembered, however, that Amenia was largely settled from New England,
and it is quite probable that the early settlers of Manchester were mostly of
New England stock. Although emigrants from New York, they held their lands
under a New Hampshire title, and common interest, as well as a common origin,
bound them closely to the residents of adjoining towns. They were doubtless
people in humble circumstances, who had settled in a new country in the hope
of improving their condition. They probably were not overburdened with
household goods on their journey hither, and they were not sufficiently supplied
with ready money to be inclined to pay twice for their lands. They were
more at home with the axe than the quill, and were not dismayed at the idea
of defending their rights with powder and ball. Of their promptness in
patriotic action and their strict fidelity to the common cause, the history
14
of the early struggles of the New Hampshire Grants furnishes ample evidence.
In the winter of 1771-2, the people of the New
Hampshire Grants residing on the west side of the mountain, established a regular
military organization for the defense of the settlements. Several companies
of militia were enrolled, and were formed into a regiment, of which Ethan Allen
was colonel. This organization soon became known as "the Green Mountain
Boys." Its members were thoroughly armed, frequently met in small detachments
for drill and practice, and were ready to respond to the call of their leaders
at a moment's notice. Manchester undoubtedly had its quota in this organization,
but the names of the men who filled it are lost beyond recovery. Gideon
Warren, of Sunderland, was a captain in the regiment, and it is probable the
Manchester men were in his company.
This military organization received its instructions
from the committees of safety, which, by the common consent of the settlers,
were charged with the protection of the Grants. The committees of the
several towns were often called together in convention for the determination
of important matters. The town of Manchester, central in location and
ardent in defense of the common rights of the settlers, was frequently chosen
as the place of their meeting. The lists of membership in those earlier
conventions have not been preserved, but the names of the more prominent members
could readily be supplied. Allen, Warner, and their associates, were often
in attendance, and must have become well known to the residents of our town.
15
Early in 1772, certain New York claimants, established
at the lower falls of Otter creek, who had driven out the New Hampshire grantees
to get possession, were in turn summarily ejected by a band of Green Mountain
Boys. When the news reached Gov. Tryon, he addressed a letter to the settlers,
requiring them to reinstate the New York claimants without delay. On the
27th of August, the committees of eleven townships assembled at Manchester and
replied to the governor's letter. Their answer was signed by "Ethan Allen,
clerk for said committees," and was evidently prepared by him in advance, and
adopted by the convention. It approved the action of the settlers without
equivocation, and declined a compliance with the governor's requisition. The
New York council considered the document "highly insolent," and expressed an
opinion that the opposition had become too formidable to be overcome without
the aid of regular troops.
But while the settlers were prepared to defend
their possessions, they still hoped for a peaceable solution of the difficulty.
In October, 1772, a convention of the several towns on the west side of the
mountain was held at Manchester, and agents were appointed to repair to London
with a petition to the king. The agents found matters at court in a favorable
condition, and returned to their people with encouraging reports. They
were soon followed by a communication from the king's council to the governor
of New York, proposing that the titles of the New Hampshire grantees be confirmed,
and that the New York grantees receive compensation out of other lands.
The New York authorities protested against this
action of the king's council, and encouraged their friends to continue their
opposition to the New Hampshire party.
16
Their principal strength on the Grants was in the town of Clarendon, where
there were many settlers who held under a New York title. These settlers were
active in their efforts to support and increase the New York interest in their
immediate locality, and were only kept from more extended operations by their
dread of the people of the southern towns. One of them wrote his patron in New
York that the condition of things from Bennington to Manchester was such that
he could not travel there with safety, and assured him that unless those and
the intermediate towns were subdued, there was an end of all government.
The settlers from Bennington to Manchester knew
that one party or the other must be subdued, and preferred it should be their
opponents. Early in the fall of 1773, a large number of them visited Clarendon,
and demanded a complete submission to the authority of the conventions.
Those who held New York commissions were directed to abstain from any further
exercise of official power; and all New York grantees were ordered to acknowledge
the New Hampshire title by repurchasing their lands. Compliance was required
within a certain time, on pain of the severest penalties. The warning
was unheeded, and at the expiration of the specified time the Green Mountain
Boys returned in force to carry their threats into execution. One unoccupied
house was burned, and one or two others unroofed. This intimidated the
New York party, and the New Hampshire settlers in the vicinity were afterwards
left in comparative quiet.
These transactions were brought to the attention
of the New York authorities, and in February, 1774, the assembly requested the
governor to offer a reward for the ap-
17
prehension of the leaders of the "Bennington mob," and directed the drafting
of a bill for the suppression of riotous proceedings. When the news of these
preliminaries reached the settlers, a general meeting of the committees of the
several towns was called to consider the situation. This convention met
at the house of Eliakim Weller in Manchester, and an adjourned meeting was afterwards
held in Arlington. A committee was appointed to prepare a defense of the
conduct of the settlers, and their report was adopted by the convention.
It was resolved to protect the proscribed leaders at the expense of life and
fortune, and to be in readiness to hasten to their defense at a moment's notice.
This was in anticipation of the expected action
of New York. The governor soon issued a proclamation offering rewards
for the apprehension of Allen and his comrades, and the assembly passed an act
which provided that such persons as might be indicted for certain riotous proceedings,
and failed to surrender themselves on the published order of the governor, should
be sentenced to imprisonment or death, as the case might be, without trial or
conviction. As soon as these documents found their way to the settlements,
another meeting was held at Manchester, which reaffirmed the action of the previous
convention in the strongest terms, and declared that any person in the New Hampshire
Grants who should accept a commission of the peace under the authority of New
York, should be deemed an enemy to the country until his majesty's pleasure
was further known.
An appeal to arms seemed the only course left
open to New York, and some may be inclined to consider the cause of the New
Hampshire grantees at this period quite des-
18
perate. They were but a handful of men in weak and scattered settlements,
while their opponents were the authorities of an opulent province. But
the match was not as unequal as it seemed. The settlers were among the
strongholds of the mountains, and under the cover of pathless forests. A
common and unavoidable peril made them earnest, vigilant and united. On
the other hand, the people of New York had no sympathy with the schemes
of the land ring, and were not disposed to follow their authorities up the Walloomsac
or the Battenkill to be shot at by men who scarcely went out of doors without
a gun, and who considered themselves disgraced if they missed their aim.
The former experience of the sheriff of Albany county seems to have satisfied
the governor that no reliance could be placed on the citizens of New York for
this service, and he applied to Gen. Gage, the king's commander-in-chief in
America, for a force of British regulars with which to subdue the Grants.
A compliance with his request was respectfully declined, and the New Hampshire
grantees remained comparatively undisturbed.
Most of the friends of the New York interest residing
on the Grants, now abandoned all active opposition to the New Hampshire party.
One prominent exception was Benjamin Hough, who held lands under a New
York title in Clarendon. The recent proceedings of the governor and assembly
had been inaugurated on his petition, and he had passed the winter in New York
urging the adoption of the most vigorous measures. In the spring he returned
to the Grants with a New York commission as justice of the peace. Having
acted under this commission, he was served with a copy of the resolution in
relation to justices adopted at Manchester, and was warned that any further
exercise of his authority would be followed by certain
19
punishment. He neglected the timely caution, and paid the severest penalty
ever exacted by the Green Mountain Boys. Late in January, 1775, his neighbors
seized him, put him on a sled, and took him through Manchester to some point
in Sunderland, where he was kept under guard until the leaders were assembled.
He was tried by Allen and his associates, found guilty of violating the decrees
of the people, and sentenced to receive two hundred lashes on the back.
His judges saw their sentence faithfully executed, furnished him with a certificate
that he had received punishment in full for his offenses against the Grants,
and sent him on his way to New York.
This was on the 30th day of January, 1775; and
the leaders who participated in the affair doubtless at once repaired to Manchester
to attend a convention called to meet there the following day, which proved
to be one of the most important ever held by the people of the Grants.
At a special meeting of the inhabitants of Manchester
on the 23d of January, 1775, it was voted to choose a committee of three to
act with the convention "appointed to meet at the house of Martin Powel" on
the 31st. William Marsh, Ebenezer Bristol and Martin Powel, were chosen
such committee, and were given discretionary power. On the day named,
a convention of the towns on the west side of the mountain, twenty-five in number,
convened at Manchester, and remained in session several days. The committees
thus assembled entered into a solemn covenant for mutual defense, and published
a series of rules for the guidance of the people. They declared that the
laws, judgments and decrees of New York growing out of the land title controversy
were not binding upon them, and would be resisted at the hazard of blood and
treasure.
20
Those who had been proscribed for defending the possessions of the settlers
were taken under the protection of the people, and New York officials were warned
that any attempt to apprehend them would be at their peril. It was ordered
that if certain prominent New York claimants or their agents should come within
the district, they should be at once apprehended and taken before the "elders
of the people and the principal officers of the Green Mountain Boys" to be dealt
with as justice required. The company officers of the regiment of Green
Mountain Boys were directed to forthwith muster their respective companies,
and see that each soldier was provided with firelock, ammunition, and tomahawk;
and to hold themselves in readiness at a minute's warning to maintain the compact
and resolutions of the convention. The committees might reasonably hope
that these solemn declarations, enforced by the experience of Justice Hough,
then on his way to New York with the marks of the "beech seal" upon his back,
would be sufficient to satisfy their opponents of the earnestness of their intentions.
Thus determined was the attitude of the settlers
towards New York when a greater contest came on, in the progress of which this
local controversy was almost lost sight of. The military preparations
and warlike spirit of the Green Mountain Boys were soon turned against another
enemy, and those who had been proclaimed rioters and outlaws gained a speedy
recognition as patriots and heroes. Before we enter upon the story of this new
conflict, let us take a single glance at Manchester one hundred years ago.
The town has only just completed the tenth year
of its history. The forest still exceeds the cleared lands, even in the
most desirable parts of the valley. The summer
21
roads are simply foot and bridle paths -- wheeled vehicles are as yet unknown.
The population of the town is probably between five and six hundred. On
the north line of the glebe, west of where the road to Noble J. Purdy's now
leaves the road between the two villages, stands a school-house -- the first
appearance of a public building in the annals of the town. The place is
without meetinghouse or minister. There is no lawyer, or court of justice,
or general government. The usual officers of a New England township manage
its local affairs, and committees of safety and correspondence have charge of
its relations with the outside world. The inhabitants are very poor, and are
sometimes in want of the necessaries of life. They have no luxuries except
what they can raise among the stumps, or catch in the streams, or bring down
with the rifle. There is a saw-mill and a grist-mill, but no village and
no store. The art of feminine ornamentation is in a very low state.
The necessities of their situation have inured the women to work, hardship and
danger. The men, clad in buckskin or in coarsest homespun, are farmers,
hunters, soldiers, as occasion may require.
Such was Manchester in May, 1775, when Allen's
messengers hurried northward through the valley, summoning the Green Mountain
Boys to join an expedition for the capture of Ticonderoga. I think we
would like to follow the men who bore that message through our town, and see
at what houses they stopped, and who came forth armed and equipped in response
to the call. But it is now too late to gratify our curiosity, and we must
be content with the single fact that remains. We know that Christopher
Roberts of Manchester took part in the expedition, and was one of the first
to enter the fort.
22
The continental congress voted to pay the men
who had taken and garrisoned Ticonderoga and Crown Point, and recommended the
further employment of the Green Mountain Boys under their own officers.
In consequence of this recommendation, measures were taken for raising a regiment.
At a convention in Dorset, in July, 1775, Warner was appointed its commander
and company officers were elected. Nathan Smith, of Manchester, was chosen
second lieutenant of the fourth company, and a part of that company was undoubtedly
recruited in this town. This regiment went to Canada with Montgomery,
repulsed Carleton at Longueil, and returned, home in November, honorably discharged.
In the following January, tidings of a great disaster
in Canada reached the Grants, accompanied by an urgent appeal for help. Warner
at once gathered a regiment, and marched to Quebec. This hastily collected
force was doubtless largely composed of the officers and men who had served
in his previous regiment. They formed the rear guard of the army in its
retreat to Ticonderoga, where they arrived in June and were discharged.
This prompt and patriotic action of the Green Mountain Boys again attracted
the attention of congress; and the day after independence was declared that
body resolved to raise a regular regiment on the New Hampshire Grants, of which
Warner was appointed colonel. This was the organization afterwards known
as Warner's continental regiment.
Although the Green Mountain Boys were among the
first to engage in active hostilities, their unfortunate relations with New
York delayed somewhat a formal expression of their sentiments. But on
the 24th of July, 1776, a convention was held at Dorset, the members of which
23
signed an association pledging their all in defense of the American states.
William Marsh, Gideon Ormsby and Martin Powel, were the delegates from Manchester,
and affixed their names to the document. The pledge thus given in behalf of
our town met the hearty approval of the great body of its citizens. Some,
however, who had been among the trusted leaders of the settlers in other emergencies,
were already estranged from their old associates, and saw themselves shunned
in the town which they had helped to found.
As the contest went on, ominous preparations were
made for the disposal of inimical persons. In September, 1776, a convention
at Dorset resolved to build a jail at some point on the west side of the mountain
for securing tories. The matter was referred to a committee, who reported
in favor of building the jail in Manchester, a few rods east of the dwelling-house
of Martin Powel; and recommended that it be made of logs and earth, with an
inside dimension of twenty by thirty feet. Their report was accepted,
and Martin Powel was chosen jail-keeper. There are indications on the
records that before the county jail was built in Manchester there was a log
jail very near its site, which was probably the building thus provided for.
If so, Martin Powel must have then kept the inn owned by William Marsh, which
stood on the spot now covered by the south wing of the Taconic (late Vanderlip)
House. This jail cannot have been extensively used for its original purpose;
for when there was the most need of securing tories, Manchester was in too exposed
a situation to render its use advisable.
Meanwhile the British troops were following up
their successes with unabated vigor. In October, 1776, Gates
24
expected an attack on Ticonderoga, and called for reinforcements of militia.
Col. Brownson's regiment, in which were the Manchester men, marched the
day after the dispatches were received. But the enemy retired to Canada
without venturing an attack, and the militia were discharged with the thanks
of the American general for their zeal and promptness.
During the succeeding winter and spring, troops
and material were collected in Canada for a much more formidable invasion.
In June, a magnificent army of eight thousand men under Gen. Burgoyne moved
slowly up the lake, threatening Ticonderoga, then garrisoned by St. Clair. The
safety of the people of this vicinity depended upon the successful defense of
that fortress, and they awaited the British advance with no inconsiderable anxiety.
As Burgoyne approached, St. Clair called for reinforcements, and the entire
militia of the Grants hastened to his assistance.
The militiamen of Manchester had been gone but
a short time when tidings of disaster and impending danger reached the anxious
people at home. Ticonderoga had fallen. Warner's continental regiment,
the pride of the New Hampshire Grants, had been cut to pieces at Hubbardton.
The dreaded Burgoyne had commenced his march to the Hudson -- the Indians
were already let loose upon the settlements. The American troops followed
close upon the news of their disaster. St. Clair arrived in Manchester,
making desperate efforts to collect provisions for his retreating army.
The garrison of Ticonderoga passed through the valley on its circuitous retreat
to the Hudson. The remnant of Warner's regiment entered the town, and
took post for the defense of the inhabitants.
25
Meanwhile, the settlers of all the region north of Manchester were passing
southward through the town, carrying their household goods, and driving their
flocks and herds before them.
In the midst of this confusion and terror there
convened in Manchester a small body of men whose proceedings constitute the
most important chapter in the history of our town. A convention of delegates
had declared the territory known as the New Hampshire Grants a separate and
independent state by the name of Vermont, and a more recent convention had established
a constitution for its government. This constitution was adopted in convention
just after the disastrous news from Ticonderoga reached that body. It
was evident that no officers under the constitution could be elected in such
a crisis, and it was equally evident that some organization must continue in
session to exercise the powers of government. The convention, therefore,
before adjourning, appointed a council of safety, consisting of twelve members,
which during the nine succeeding months yielded unlimited power in Vermont.
A majority of the council at once repaired to
Manchester, and remained in session here several days before proceeding to Bennington.
The journal of the council during this period has never been found, and a full
list of the members who attended cannot be given. It is known that Thomas Chittenden,
Nathan Clark and Ira Allen, were among the number. Moses Robinson, Heman
Allen and Jonas Fay, were doubtless present. Jeremiah Clark of Shaftesbury,
grandfather of the late Myron Clark, was a member of the council, and we may
infer from the vicinity of his residence that he was in attendance. These
men
26
had borne a prominent part in the trying history of the New Hampshire Grants;
but, accustomed as they were to situations of difficulty and peril, they must
have assembled here in a condition bordering on despair. In the track
of a victorious army and in the midst of a fleeing community, they were expected
to oppose the one and protect the other, without troops, without money and without
credit.
The council held their sessions in the inn before
referred to, owned by William Marsh, and probably kept by Martin Powel. It
was a plain wooden building, less than two full stories, standing with the side
to the road, in size not far from fifty by forty-five feet. The ground
floor consisted of two front rooms of about the same size, a kitchen in the
rear of these rooms, extending from the south end of the building, and a pantry
north of the kitchen. The main entrance was nearly in the center of the
building, and opened into the south front room. From this room a door
opened into the kitchen, and in the south end of the kitchen was the stairway
leading to the upper story. On this floor were two small rooms in the
rear, a large front chamber in the south end of the building, and a smaller
one in the north end. These were the scanty accommodations of an inn which
often numbered among its guests the leading men of Vermont, and in which were
enacted some of the most interesting scenes of her early history.
Warner established his camp on the hill south-west
of the village, on the premises now generally known as the Swift farm.
There his regiment was rejoined by the stragglers who had been separated from
it in the confusion of retreat, and was supplied with ammunition and clothing
from the depots of the northern department. A body of
27
the enemy had been left in the vicinity of Castleton, and an advance from
that quarter was daily expected. The force under Warner's command was
too weak for opposition, and in case of an immediate movement his retreat was
inevitable. The inhabitants were well aware of this, and it was feared
that unless reinforcements were speedily obtained, the people of Manchester
would follow the example of the settlers of more northerly towns, and take refuge
in the lower country. Citizens of tory proclivities were jubilant and
defiant, and despondency and doubt were making dangerous progress in the whig
ranks.
Having sent urgent requests for the support of
neighboring states, the council of safety deliberated long and earnestly as
to what Vermont could do for herself. To a community so weak and impoverished,
the maintenance of a single company would have seemed a heavy burden. The council
were disposed to tax the ability of the people to the utmost, and arm and equip
two companies. Then Ira Allen, the youngest member of the council, proposed
the enlistment of a full regiment. The older members explained the utter impossibility
of raising the funds necessary for such a force. Allen insisted that some method
could be devised to provide the means, and his brethren gave him till the rising
of the morrow's sun to perfect a plan. During the intervening hours
the sanguine statesman, then only twenty-six years of age, considered his difficult
problem. At the appointed time he met with the council, and was ready
to submit his views. He proposed nothing less than the seizure and confiscation
of all the tory estates. The measure he recommended proved acceptable
to the council, and was at once sanctioned by its decree. This decree
of confiscation, resolved upon within a stone's
28
throw of where we are met to-night, was the first instance of the confiscation
of tory property during the revolution, and the estates of the tory residents
of Manchester were the first property seized for the public defense.
The weak and wavering who trembled at the progress
of Burgoyne, and were disposed to take the benefit of his proclamations, now
found that there were other dangers to be considered. The council of safety
carried their decree into execution with a vigor which confounded their enemies.
Commissioners of sequestration were appointed and given the amplest powers.
Suspected persons were arrested and held for trial. The property of those who
had fled to the British camp was seized without delay. Their goods and
chattels were sold at public vendue, and their farms rented for the benefit
of the state. Money flowed into the treasury; soldiers were raised, equipped
and paid; and within thirty days after the confiscation was decreed the council
of safety sent out an organized battalion to meet the enemy.
This new organization was called "The Rangers,"
and was commanded by Herrick. Recruits for the regiment were collected
at Manchester as fast as enlisted. Warner's encampment was further strengthened
by the arrival of a small body of militia from the east side of the mountain.
On the 20th of July there were about five hundred troops in Manchester.
On the 2d of August, Maj. Gen. Lincoln of the continental army arrived
in town to take command of the New England militia, and operate upon Burgoyne's
communications. Cushing's Worcester county regiment arrived two days later.
Others were on their way, and Lincoln hoped in a few days to be in command
of two thousand men.
29
While these reinforcements were being hurried
to Manchester, Burgoyne was preparing for an expedition to the same point.
Baume received written instructions to proceed to Arlington, secure the pass
to Manchester, and await the arrival of Sherwood's provincials from the south.
He was then to proceed to Manchester, and secure the pass of the mountains
on the road to Rockingham. From this place he was to send the Indians
and light troops on an expedition northward, and on their return was to cross
the mountains to the Connecticut. Burgoyne mentioned the fact that "Mr.
Warner" was supposed to be at Manchester, but considered it highly probable
that he would retreat without resistance. These instructions were subsequently
countermanded, and Baume was ordered direct to Bennington.
In response to the urgent appeals of the council
of safety, the government of New Hampshire raised a brigade of militia for service
in Vermont, and placed it under command of Gen. Stark. It may be interesting
to notice that Mesheck Weare, president of the New Hampshire council, who now
ordered Stark to march to the assistance of the Vermonters, was one of the original
proprietors of Manchester, and was once the owner of lot number forty in the
first division, on the west end of which Music Hall now stands.
On the 6th of August, Stark was at Bromley (now
Peru), and on the 7th he arrived in Manchester, where most of his troops were
already encamped. Schuyler's orders awaited him here, but Stark claimed
an independent command by virtue of his instructions, and declined obedience.
On the 8th he left Manchester for Bennington, where he arrived the following
day. He was accompanied or fol-
30
lowed by most of the Vermont militia. Warner's regiment was left behind,
but was soon summoned by an express. The scouts were called in from the
north, and in the heavy rains of the 15th of August, the regiment marched to
Bennington, and arrived on the field in time to take part in the closing engagement
of the following day.
Soon after the battle of Bennington Stark joined
the forces in front of Burgoyne, while most of the Vermont troops returned to
Manchester. Early in September Lincoln advanced towards Ticonderoga, through
Dorset and Pawlet, with Herrick's Rangers and a body of militia. After
various successes in that quarter he was recalled by Gates, and returned to
Manchester with most of his troops. Leaving a small force here under Gen.
Bayley, he joined the main army at Saratoga. On the 17th of October, Burgoyne
surrendered his forces, and the New England militia returned to their homes.
Now that the great campaign of 1777 is
over, let us trace its connection with the individual fortunes of some of our
citizens.
Josiah Burton, who came to Manchester about 1773,
enlisted in Warner's continental regiment January 1, 1777, for three years.
He was in the engagement at Hubbardton, and left the field beside his commander
when the day was lost. After the battle of Bennington, he asked and obtained
leave to go home and send a son to serve in his stead. His son Elijah,
then sixteen years of age, took his place, and was with the regiment at Burgoyne's
surrender.
John Roberts, a veteran of the French and Indian
war, who came to Manchester soon after its settlement, and
31
located where Mrs. E. L. Way now lives, enlisted in Warner's regiment February
19, 1777, to serve during the war. He was in the battle of Bennington,
and four of his five sons, Peter, John, William and Benjamin, also took part
in that engagement. The remaining son, Christopher, was taking the women
and children to a place of safety, and had got into Massachusetts when he heard
of the victory and returned.
George Sexton, who lived near the bridge in the
Barnumville district, enlisted in Warner's regiment March 25, 1777. He
was an ensign during the campaign of that year, and was afterwards promoted
to a lieutenancy. Nathan Beaman, an uncle of the late Rev. Dr. Beaman
of Troy, enlisted in the regiment on the first of June. He had formerly
lived in the vicinity of Ticonderoga, and had acted as Allen's guide at the
time of its capture. Truman Mead enlisted the same day, and served as
fifer. Penuel Stevens, Amos Allen, Prince Soper and Edward Soper, joined the
regiment before the campaign commenced.
Nathan Smith was a captain of militia during the
year 1777. Some time in August he was "sent by the council after
tories," in which service he was employed three days with twenty-one men. He
was in the battle of Bennington, in connection with which his name has come
down to us with especial honor. You will remember that after two hours' incessant
firing at musketry distance the enemys' entrenchments were carried by assault,
with a gallantry which won the admiration of the veteran Stark, and excited
the astonishment of officers trained in the wars of Europe. The raw militia
rushed up the ascent in the face of a deadly volley, sprang upon the well defended
parapet, and threw themselves upon the pikes and sabres of the German
32
troops. It will do for us to cherish a little local pride in this matter,
for Captain Nathan Smith and Benjamin Vaughan were in the front of that famous
charge, and were the first men who mounted the enemy's works.
Gideon Ormsby was one of the military men of the
town, and was evidently in active service during the campaign, but in what capacity
or organization cannot be stated. His prominence and activity in the American
cause had gained him the hearty hatred of some of his neighbors, and when the
advance of Burgoyne raised the hopes and courage of the tories, his property
and family were in no small danger. His young orchard was girdled, and
one or two attempts were made to burn his buildings. Notwithstanding the
threats of the tories and the departure of many of her whig neighbors, Mrs.
Ormsby remained at home with her small children until the campaign was over.
Martin Powel was appointed a commissioner of sequestration
immediately after the decree of confiscation, and was one of the most trusted
and active officers of the council. In the preserved records of that body
we catch glimpses of him here and there; calling together the committee of safety
for action in the case of a suspected person; journeying to a neighboring town
to take charge of a yoke of oxen belonging to the state; disposing of sequestered
property on appraisal; or furnishing a cow from the confiscated drove for the
needy wife of some absent tory. The duties of his difficult and responsible
position were evidently performed with excellent judgment and perfect integrity.
He must at times have found those duties anything but pleasant; for he
was more than once called upon to seize and dispose of the property of men
33
with whom he had long been associated in town affairs, and at whose houses
he had been a welcome guest.
Samuel Rose, a son of the first settler in town,
accepted a captain's commission in the British army, and undertook to recruit
a company of tories. He was furnished hard money with which to stimulate
the loyalty of his neighbors, and succeeded in luring a few young men to his
standard. He and his handful of recruits were ignominiously captured one
dark night, just as they were leaving Manchester for the British army, somewhat
in the manner described in
The Rangers. Early in September, 1777, the council of
safety sent him to Gen. Gates with a statement of his offenses, and a recommendation
that he be sent on board the guard-ships in the North river. His farm
was confiscated, and soon after became the property of Samuel Pettibone.
Nehemiah French and Henry Bullis joined the tory
company of Capt. Adams of Arlington, and went to the British army. On
the 12th of September they voluntarily appeared before the council of safety,
and submitted themselves to its pleasure. The council considered what
Bullis had already lost a sufficient punishment for his condnet, but French
was compelled to pay a fine of twenty pounds. They were then permitted
to take the oath of allegiance, and were given passes to their farms in Manchester.
The experience of Bennet Beardslee will illustrate
the unfortunate condition of a suspected person in those times. On the
6th of September, 1777, he was adjudged an enemy of the United States
and a dangerous person to go at large, and ordered to be confined in the common
jail at Westminster. On the 17th the council reconsidered its action,
and sentenced him to pay a fine of fifteen pounds. On the
34
19th he was permitted to pass to Manchester, to return at the expiration of
five days unless his fine was paid within that time. He succeeded in raising
the money and secured his discharge. A convention of committees afterwards
took his case in hand, and sent him again to the council. On the 3d of January,
1778, he was permitted to go home to return on the 8th, probably to enable him
to obtain evidence. On the 9th the council decided that he had been guilty of
no crime since his satisfaction of their former judgment, and ordered his discharge;
and Lieut. Peter Roberts, commissioner of sequestration, was directed to deliver
him his horse and other effects recently taken.
In May, 1778, the governor and council had their
attention called to the fact that Mrs. Jeremiah French of Manchester was "very
turbulent and troublesome," and refused to obey orders. It is not difficult
to account for considerable asperity on the part of Mrs. French. Her husband,
who had joined the British army to march into Albany, had considered himself
fortunate in securing his retreat to Canada. His cattle and horses had
been seized and driven away and sold. His farm was now being cultivated
for the benefit of the state under the supervision of Martin Powel, commissioner
of sequestration. We can easily believe that Mrs. French carried a bitter
tongue in those days, and perhaps refused to yield a peaceable possession to
the men who tilled her husband's lands for the new state. The council
were not disposed to tolerate her opposition, and concluded to send her to her
husband. Necessary clothing, bedding, and kitchen utensils for herself
and family were set aside, and the rest of her movables were sold to pay the
expenses of transportation. Then he, and her children, and the remainder
of her goods,
35
were taken to the frontier, and sent under guard to the British lines.
Jeremiah French lived on the Benjamin Munson place,
and owned all the land on which is located that part of the village lying east
of the center of the street from H. P. Way's to M. H. Wooster's, except the
strip of land, then known as the public common, on which stands the row of buildings
between the Benjamin Munson place and the house lately occupied by L. C. Orvis.
This property was all condemned by the court of confiscation. In the fall
of 1778, that part of it lying north of the old road leading east from the Benjamin
Munson place, was sold by the state to Jared Munson, of Lanesborough. The
lot lying south was soon after deeded to Gideon Ormsby, and most of it was subsequently
conveyed to Gov. Chittenden.
William Marsh, who was a son-in-law of Jeremiah
French, seems to have moved into Dorset in the spring of 1777. He
had been very prominent among the friends of the American cause, and had pledged
himself by "all the ties held sacred among mankind" to oppose the British forces
at the risk of life and fortune. In June, he was chairman of a committee
to wait on the commander of Ticonderoga in relation to the defense of the frontier
-- in July, he rode to the British army. He was sincere in his early support
of our cause, but was not strong enough to withstand family influences and the
successes of Burgoyne, and concluded to save himself by a timely submission.
Tradition says he was with Burgoyne's army when the surrender became inevitable,
and started to return home. He soon fell in with Truman Mead and asked
him if he thought it would be safe for him to return. Mead told him that
if he did he would certainly be shot, whereupon Marsh
36
burst into tears and turned his horse's head northward. He was proscribed
with other prominent tories, but was afterwards permitted to return to the state,
and lived and died in Dorset.
In the spring of 1777, Marsh was the owner
of all the land on which stands that part of Manchester village west of the
main street; but a few weeks before he went to the British army he sold that
part of it lying south of the north line of the Hoyt place. All the rest was
confiscated to the use of the state. The portion lying north of the north
line of Mr. Shattuck's place was bought by Jared Munson, and that lying south
by Thaddeus Munson.
Various pieces of land in other parts of the valley,
belonging to Marsh and tories of less note, were also confiscated. Eight
citizens of Manchester who took the British side of the controversy were proscribed
by an act of the legislature, and their return to the state prohibited.
A British commission afterwards visited the town to appraise their former possessions,
and they were given lands of equal value in Canada. Some of them became
prosperous and valuable citizens of the provinces.
After the campaign of 1777, the military
service of the citizens of Manchester was mainly in defense of the frontier.
Forts were erected in Pittsford, Rutland and Castleton, and were garrisoned
by detachments of militia. These detachments were composed of quotas selected
by draft or otherwise from the various militia organizations. In times
of especial alarm the companies at home hastened to the frontier, and remained
until the danger was over.
In April, 1778, Warner's regiment was ordered
to Albany, and detachments of militia were sent to strengthen
37
the frontier. A company of fifty-six men, mostly residents of Manchester,
under Capt. Nathan Smith, was in service a few days. In May, 1778, we
find Nathan Smith major of the fifth regiment, and Jonathan Saxton, adjutant.
The first company was located at Manchester. Its officers were Gideon
Ormsby, captain, Solomon Soper, lieutenant, and William Saxton, ensign. In
November of that year, Capt. Ormsby and thirty-one of his company were sent
to the frontier, and were on duty eight days.
In 1780 there were three companies of militia
in Manchester, all in the regiment of Col. Ira Allen, who then lived in the
north part of Sunderland. In the month of March, Capt. Ormsby with fifty-six
men, and Capt. Thomas Bull with twenty-three men, visited the frontier.
Soon after this Ormsby was succeeded in the captaincy by Thomas Barney, and
subsequently became major of a regiment raised for continuous service.
In October, 1780, a large British force sailed up the lake, and the whole militia
of the state was ordered to the frontier. The three Manchester companies
under Capts. Thomas Barney, Jacob Odel and Thomas Bull, were out with full ranks.
At this time the town had about one hundred and fifty men in service, probably
her entire military population.
In October, 1781, there was another alarm on the
frontier, and the three Manchester companies were again called into service.
But the news of Cornwallis's surrender soon reached the British forces; whereupon
they retired into Canada, and active hostilities in the northern department
ceased.
The defense of the frontier was not the only duty
which demanded the attention of the militia during this period. There
was still a strong New York party in the south
38
eastern part of the state, which at times proved quite troublesome to the
authorities of Vermont. In May, 1779, a body of volunteers from this side
of the mountain went over to assist the sheriff of Cumberland county in the
execution of the laws. This service seems to have been quite popular,
and officers came to the front in surprising numbers. The volunteers from
Manchester were Major Nathan Smith, Capt. Gideon Ormsby, Capt. Jesse Sawyer,
Capt. Zadock Everist, Capt. Stephen Pearl, Adjutant Jonathan Saxton, Lieut.
Thaddeus Munson, Lieut. Solomon Soper, and the same number of men without titles.
It will be remembered that Vermont once formed
a union with several towns in New York lying on her western border, with a view
to strengthen herself against the claims of that state. In December, 1781,
the friends of the Vermont union in those towns were threatened by the New York
militia, and troops from this section were ordered to their support. A
detachment under Major Ormsby, and a few members of Capt. Barney's company were
engaged in this expedition. The New York forces retired before superior
numbers, and the affair ended without bloodshed.
One or two incidents will further illustrate the
character of the times. In the spring of 1782, a band of tories which
had been recruited in Albany county undertook to make their way through Vermont
to the British posts. They arrived at Arlington in the night, where they
were furnished supplies. Just as they were leaving, an officer of militia
happened that way, and was taken prisoner. While on their march they fell in
with Jonathan Ormsby of Manchester, a son of Major Ormsby, and seized him.
They then abandoned the road for the shelter of Equinox
39
mountain, and hurried north. The alarm was soon given, and the militiamen
in the west part of the town seized their guns and followed in pursuit. Major
Ormsby sent word to Col. Ira Allen, who hastened to Manchester and dispatched
an express to Capt. Eastman, of Rupert, with directions to raise his men and
waylay the tories at a pass in the mountain. Eastman got out his force
in time, and the tories, finding themselves beset both in front and rear, surrendered
without resistance.
About this time "some brave and spirited people
in Manchester," as Ira Allen calls them, set out to pull down the house of a
tory resident of Arlington, perhaps in revenge for the assistance given the
party which captured Ormsby. In Sunderland they were met by Ira Allen,
Gideon Brownson and Eli Brownson, who with difficulty persuaded them to return.
Allen was at that time engaged in a secret negotiation with the British
general in Canada, undertaken from patriotic motives, but a discovery of which
just then would have been decidedly awkward. He mentions, to illustrate
the dangers attending the negotiation, that on that very night he crossed the
ground where he had turned back the Manchester party, and met a number of British
soldiers, and received dispatches from the enemy. In 1781 and 1782, a
British officer and soldiers under arms passed several times back and forth
along the west mountain between the British posts and Sunderland, without discovery.
It was during these years of conflict and excitement that our earliest religious
societies struggled into existence. The first ministerial labor in Manchester
was performed by Rev. Seth Swift in the year 1776. The necessity of building
a house of worship was soon generally
40
acknowledged, but the place for its location was not so easily agreed upon.
It was evidently thought that the location of the meeting-house would be likely
to determine the site of the future village, and prominent citizens on the line
of the old road took part in the controversy with a zeal not altogether spiritual.
The record indicates that the town was pretty evenly divided between two
localities, and that the matter was long in suspense. In December, 1778,
the town voted to build a meeting-house thirty feet square, on such site as
might be selected by a committee of indifferent persons. In June, 1779,
it was voted that the meeting-house be forty feet by thirty-six, and two stories
high, and that it be located near the dwelling of Christopher Roberts, on the
lot now owned by Mrs. E. L. Way. Timbers for the frame were prepared at
that place, but they were surreptitiously taken one night by the party opposed
to that location, and deposited on the public common. In November of the
same year, the town again voted to build the meeting-house on such spot as the
committee might select, and it was soon after erected on the ground occupied
by the present Congregational edifice. In October, 1780, the society instructed
their committee to "procure some agreeable person to preach the gospel." The
church was organized with seven members in 1784, but it was many years before
it was blessed with the services of a settled minister.
The Baptist society was organized in 1781.
Their earliest pastor was the Rev. Joseph Cornall, who became entitled to the
land set apart for the first settled minister. Before the erection of
their meeting-house, they sometimes held services in a building near the falls
on Glebe brook, a place now quite remote from any road or dwell-
41
ing. An organization of the Protestant Episcopal church was effected
in 1782, under the charge of Rev. Gideon Bostwick; but it was nearly forty years
before the people of that denomination erected a house of worship.
In this early period of our state organization
there was no permanent seat of government, and sessions of the legislature were
held in several of the larger towns. In October, 1779, the representatives
assembled in Manchester at the Weller tavern stand, and remained in session
two weeks. Congress had recently taken action indicative of a disposition
to sustain the claim of New York to the territory of Vermont; had proposed to
undertake the settlement of all differences on a basis which entirely ignored
the claims of Vermont to an independent existence; and had resolved that no
unappropriated or confiscated lands ought to be disposed of until its decision
had been made. These proceedings received the careful attention of the
legislature, and met with a spirited response. Governor, council, and
assembly, unanimously resolved to proceed with the disposal of their lands,
and to "support their right to independence at congress and to the world."
In 1782, the disorders in Windham county culminated
in armed resistance to the authority of Vermont, and a special session of the
governor and council was held to consider the crisis. They met on the
29th of August at the house of Elias Gilbert, who lived on the hill southwest
of the village. The council advised his excellency to raise troops for
the enforcement of the laws, and to commission Ethan Allen as their commander.
Allen crossed the mountain with two hundred and fifty volunteers, threatened
Guilford with the desolation of Sodom and Gomorrah, and put an end to the disturbances
without
42
loss of life. Capt. Barney and seven of his company were among the volunteers
on this occasion.
In October, 1782, the legislature again assembled
in Manchester. The larger body is said to have held its sessions in the
meeting-house, and the council doubtless occupied an upper room in one of the
inns. The most important action of the session was the appointment of
a committee to visit the American congress, and negotiate for the admission
of Vermont into the union, or agree upon terms of confederation.
A few professional gentlemen were now located
in Manchester, but concerning their residence here comparatively little is known.
The first practitioner of medicine in town of whom there is any mention was
John Page. He appears as a resident of Manchester in 1777, and was evidently
here four or five years. In 1781, he was connected with Ira Allen's regiment
as surgeon's mate.
Dr. Lewis Beebe was a resident of Manchester in
1780, and was at that time surgeon of Allen's regiment. He was greatly
interested in the progress of medical science, and was one of the corporators
of "The First Medical Society in Vermont," and its first secretary. He
was also quite active in public affairs, and was a member of the council of
censors in 1785. He probably left Manchester about the year 1787.
In 1782, Jonathan Brace, who had graduated from
Yale College three years before, settled in town and engaged in the practice
of law. He lived where Mr. Shattuck does, and built a house on the premises
occupied by Mrs. F. W. Hoyt. After a residence here of three or four years
he
43
returned to Connecticut, and was afterwards mayor of Hartford and member of
congress.
About 1784, Samuel Hitchcock, a native of Massachusetts
and a graduate of Harvard College, became a resident of Manchester and commenced
practice as an attorney. He was a warden of the Episcopal church in 1785,
and the records indicate his residence here until March, 1787. Soon after
this he removed to Burlington, where he married a daughter of Ethan Allen, held
various local offices, and was finally appointed United States district judge.
These gentlemen were but temporary residents;
others came who made Manchester their abode for life, and whose descendants
are numerous in town to-day. Nathaniel Collins was prominent in local
affairs in 1779. Nathaniel Boorn was then living in the east part of the
town, and the stream in that section was known as Boorn brook as early as 1787.
Jabez Hawley was then located near the south-west corner. James Jameson
was already living on Jameson flats, and before 1790 we find the names of Richardson,
Anderson and Benedict in the north part of the town.
Not long after 1780 a tavern was erected where
Mr. Fowler's house now stands. In 1788, it was kept by Stephen Keys, formerly
of Connecticut, who had served in the revolution as an officer in Sheldon's
regiment of dragoons. Keys occupied the house several years, but it was
then owned, and was afterwards kept, by Abel Allis, and has generally been spoken
of as the old Allis tavern. Mrs. Allis, once the landlady of this inn,
was a daughter of Remember Baker, the Arlington mill-wright who had shared with
Allen and Warner the military lead-
44
ership of the settlers, and fallen by an Indian bullet while scouting for
Montgomery's advance.
In 1788, we must consider the resident of Manchester
village reasonably supplied with the comforts and conveniences of life. If
he requires the attendance of a physician, a little south of Keys' tavern, on
the opposite side of the street, is the residence of Dr. William Gould, a graduate
of Yale, and a prominent member of the Vermont medical society. If any
former experience has shaken his confidence in Dr. Gould, he can request the
attendance of Dr. Azel Washburn, a physician and surgeon of several years' experience,
who will doubtless give him the best of attention. If he has a difficulty
with his neighbor, legal assistance of the best kind can easily be obtained.
A short distance south of Dr. Gould's, lives Enoch Woodbridge, who will
soon become chief justice of the supreme court. If Squire Woodbridge has
been so unfortunate as to lose a case for him, he can still secure the services
of Mr. Samuel Hitchcock, who, notwithstanding his change of residence, keeps
up his practice here. If the ladies of his family wish to do some shopping,
James Caldwell & Co., at their stand a few rods south of Mr. Woodbridge's,
have recently added to their former assortment a quantity of English goods just
imported from London, and payment will be taken in wheat or ashes. In case the
services of a prescription druggist are required, next door north of Keys' inn
is the drug store of Dr. Abel Allis, who receives his goods immediately from
Europe by the way of Canada, and will make up his prescription with the greatest
accuracy. If our resident is a mason, he will doubtless visit the rooms
of the North Star Lodge in the upper part of Keys' inn. If it is time
to dispose of the contents of the
45
rag-bag, he can carry along the bundle and leave it at Keys' to be taken to
the paper-mill in Bennington. If he wishes to keep up with current events,
the post-rider will leave with him weekly the Vermont Gazette, the subscription
price of which is three bushels of wheat, to be lodged with Major Stephen Keys.
Should the wheat crop fail he need not be alarmed; flax seed or rags will
be thankfully received in payment.
In October, 1788, the subscribers of the
Gazette had the pleasure of reading a full account of the proceedings
in Manchester on the assembling of the legislature for its annual session.
The arrival of the governor was announced by the discharge of five cannon by
the artillery company of Capt. Harmon. His excellency was escorted into
town by three companies of cavalry, commanded by Capts. Robinson, Hitchcock
and Clark. Two companies of light infantry, under Capts. Todd and Gray,
were on parade, and saluted the governor as be passed. Lt. Col. Keys, of Manchester,
the officer of the day, then took command of the troops and performed various
military maneuvres; after which a sermon, suitable to the occasion, was delivered
by Rev. Elijah Sill of Dorset. Declaration was then made that his excellency,
Thomas Chittenden, was elected governor for the ensuing year, and his honor,
Joseph Marsh, lieutenant-governor. The troops were again formed and fourteen
cannon fired. The proceedings closed with a general discharge of fire-arms
by the cavalry and light infantry, and the people dispersed with every expression
of satisfaction. The gentlemen of the legislature then commenced their
labors; the assembly occupying the meeting-house, and the council sitting in
the chamber of Thaddeus Munson's inn.
46
Among the citizens of Manchester who gathered to witness this military display, there was doubtless a sturdy veteran whose name is somewhat prominent in the early history of the state, and whose few years' residence in our town entitles him to mention here. This was Peleg Sunderland, a man whose adventurous life might serve for the foundation of a romance. In his younger days he had been a famous hunter and trapper, and had almost made the wilderness his home. He had thus become familiar with the great forest of northern Vermont before the axe of the earliest settler had disturbed it. He had nearly perished of starvation in its desolate wilds, and had been rescued by Indian hunters. He had shared with them the life of the camp and the pleasures of the chase, and had acquired a knowledge of their language and customs. In the land title controversy which soon came on, his restless energy found employment not less congenial to his tastes. He soon became known in New York as a bold and active defender of the New Hampshire Grants, and was one of the eight against whom were aimed the terrors of the riot act and executive proclamation. He was a member of the extemporized tribunal which ordered a liberal application of the beech seal in the case of Justice Hough, and secured thereby the honor of an additional reward for his apprehension. His knowledge of the northern country and its inhabitants was of service to the leading patriots in their earliest preparations for the war of independence. When John Brown of Pittsfield undertook a secret expedition to Canada in behalf of the Boston committee of correspondence, Sunderland went with him as interpreter and guide. He was sent among the Indians to ascertain their feelings with regard to the coming conflict, and brought back as-
47
surances of their friendly disposition. After his return he took part
in the expedition against the fortresses on the lake, and signed with Warner
the dispatch to the authorities of Connecticut announcing the capture of Crown
Point.
In 1791, Peleg Sunderland, Gideon Ormsby, Martin
Powel, Nathan Smith and George Sexton, were all living in Manchester. They
had served the state with fidelity and zeal through many troublous years, and
been honored with the friendship and confidence of its leading men. They were
now enjoying the reward of their faithful service, no longer threatened with
the loss of lands or disturbed by alarm of war. They may have sometimes
met together in those quiet days, and indulged in reminiscences of the trials
and dangers through which they had passed. The conversation of those five
men in such an hour must have been no mean review of the early history of our
state. Their several experiences embraced the early conventions of the
settlers; the various expeditions of the Green Mountain Boys; the first success
of the revolution at the gates of Ticonderoga; the perilous campaigns in Canada;
the triumphant advance of Burgoyne; the rule of the council of safety; the conflicts
of Hubbardton, Bennington and Saratoga. Some who had shared with them
the labors of that eventful period had not been permitted to see the full realization
of their hopes. The bold leaders whom they had sat with in council and
followed in battle were no longer living. Warner had worn out his stalwart
frame in the service of Vermont, and returned to his native state to die.
Allen had recently been followed to the grave by a large concourse of his old
associates. But the work they had commenced more than twenty years
48
before had been brought to a successful issue after their departure, and Vermont
was now a member of the Federal Union -- the peer of New York.
The leaders of the Green Mountain Boys have received
the honor which is their due. Their bones repose beneath columns of granite,
on which are inscribed the tributes of a grateful people. Their statues
have been setup in public places, and eloquent voices have pronounced their
eulogies. As we have joined in the general homage it seems never to have
occurred to us that there were citizens of our own town who served as faithfully
and bravely as those of higher rank, and who were at least entitled to remembrance
in the place where they lived and among their own descendants. The meagre
record you have heard to-night is nearly all that can now be told of the most
prominent; of many others who served the town with equal merit there is no vestige
remaining.
Nearly all who died in Manchester during the first
twenty-five years of its history sleep in unmarked graves. The first burial
ground in town embraced within its limits the space until recently occupied
by the school-house, the spot on which the court house stands, and the street
between the court house and drug store. Most of the interments, previous
to 1791, were made in this ground. At the commencement of the present
century, it was entirely uncared for, and run over without regard to its nature.
In 1812, many of the small rough headstones were still standing, and the
ground was uneven with the graves. When the war fever was at its height
the recruiting officers removed the stones, and leveled the ground and converted
it into a parade. Women shed tears and old men shook their heads, but
the work of desecration went on, and under
49
the heavy tread of the volunteers the last indications of the old burying-ground
soon disappeared. In digging for the foundations of the various buildings
which have since occupied the spot, the bones of more than one sleeper have
been disturbed by the spade of the workman. So many years have elapsed
since this burial ground became the business centre of the village that a knowledge
of what the place once was has almost passed from the minds of men. But
if the fathers and mothers of the town were to rise from their graves tonight,
they would meet you as you turn from the door of this hall, and look out upon
you from the court house windows, and stand upon the little green where many
of their descendants have raced and shouted in childish sports, unconscious
of the mouldering forms beneath. It is impossible for us to rectify this
error of a former generation, but we can at least do something to preserve the
memory of those whose graves have been so rudely treated.
In 1781, the present county of Bennington was
established, and Manchester made a half-shire town. The courts were held
for several years in the meeting-house, or in one of the village inns.
The erection of the necessary county buildings was delayed by various difficulties
concerning their location. The desire of the locating committee to place
them within the present limits of Factory Point was defeated by their inability
to purchase a lot on which to build them. Then the efforts of Martin Powel,
the owner of the Noble J. Purdy farm, nearly secured their erection on the hill
just east of that place. Finally, the exertions of the citizens of the
village, aided by the influence of Gideon Ormsby, secured their location on
the
50
public common, where they were erected in 1794-5. The building is now
that part of the Manchester hotel block occupied by Nelson Perkins, including
the press room of the Journal office. The walls of the jail have been
relaid, but its foundation remains unchanged. Its bad reputation as a
place of security for criminals commenced at an early date. A few months
after its completion three noted counterfeiters, branded in the forehead with
the letter C, and with the right ear cropped, made their escape through its
walls.
In 1784, the general assembly of Vermont passed
an act establishing regular posts and post-offices for the conveyance and distribution
of letters and packets. Under this arrangement there were only five offices
in the state, and Manchester was not among the favored communities. The post-offices
nearest the town were at Bennington and Rutland. After the admission of
Vermont into the union the postal facilities of the state were somewhat improved.
On the first of June, 1792, a post-office was established at Manchester, but
this remained for some time the only one between Bennington and Rutland.
Abel Allis was our first postmaster, and held the office until 1803, when he
was succeeded by Joel Pratt.
In the last decade of the eighteenth century,
the population of Manchester was about fourteen hundred. Some of the back
districts of the town were more thickly settled than now, but the village was
still quite small. It was, however, sufficiently advanced in the ways
of civilization to number among its institutions a tailoring establishment and
a hatter's shop. The best house in the village was the Allis tavern.
The dwellings generally were not distinguished for elegance or size. The
little house which
51
stands opposite the residence of J. A. Munson was then occupied by Truman
Squires, a young lawyer of ability and position, secretary to the governor and
council, who not only considered it large enough for a residence, but found
room in one corner for his law office. The waters of the Battenkill were
still filled with salmon trout; the deer were not yet entirely driven from the
neighboring forests; and packs of hungry wolves frequently entered the settlement
and made havoc among the farmer's stock. In hours of leisure, the inhabitants
amused themselves by racing horses through the street, scouring the woods in
hunting parties, or playing at wicket on the village green. The management
of town affairs was still in the hands of the earlier settlers. Young
gentlemen of college education and professional attainments had made their appearance
in town; but no learning of the schools or polish of the outer man could draw
away the affections or the votes of the people from the sturdy men who had borne
the brunt of the battle with the Yorkers and the tories. Gideon Ormsby
and Martin Powel were still the leaders of the town, and held their influence
unbroken to the last. Ormsby represented Manchester in the general assembly
seventeen years. Powel was town clerk twenty-one years, representative
seven years, and judge of probate twelve years.
There was already numbered among the active citizens
of Manchester a man who lived to see the hundredth anniversary of the settlement
of the town. Nearly the youngest of my auditors have seen the bent form
and silvered head of Serenus Swift. Their recollection of that aged man
may serve to connect them more closely with the men and events of the past century.
He was born
52
before Ticonderoga was taken, and remembered the closing incidents of the revolution. His feet were familiar with our street before the foundations of a single building, now standing, were laid. He held office under the second administration of George Washington, and was often associated in local affairs with Ormsby and Powel. He was doubtless among the inhabitants of Manchester who, on the last Saturday of May, 1793, gazed upon the handsome wagon which the mail carriers had put on the route between Bennington and Rutland -- the first public conveyance for the transportation of passengers which passed through our valley. When he was entering upon manhood, town meetings were called at the meeting-house; the first interments in the new burying-ground south of the village, had just been made; George Sexton and Robert Anderson were advertising a lottery in aid of the road across the Green Mountains; merchantable grain was the common currency of the community; the inhabitants were satisfied with a weekly mail each way; the columns of the local paper were crowded with the dispatches of Bonaparte, general-in-chief of the army of Italy. The young federal office-holder was probably not over popular in town, for Manchester was largely republican, and party strife ran high. Political celebrations were frequently indulged in, and were sometimes occasions of considerable local interest. In 1795, the inhabitants of Manchester, Sunderland and Dorset united in celebrating the anniversary of the battle of Bennington. A battalion of Col. Roberts's regiment of militia, consisting of the companies from those towns, under command of Major Martindale, Capt. Bradley's company of cavalry, and two companies of light infantry under Capt. Tousley and Lieut.
53
Graves, took part in the celebration. After a time spent in military
movements, the militia and spectators formed a hollow square on the green near
the court house, and listened to orations by Dr. Todd, of Arlington; and the
Rev. Chauncey Lee, of Sunderland. The report of a committee before appointed
to take into consideration the treaty of amity, commerce and navagation, was
then read. The committee expressed their abhorrence of the treaty in the
language of their fellow-citizens of South Carolina, censured Senator Paine
of Vermont for his favorable vote in the severest terms, and expressed a hope
that the father of his country would prove his right to the appellation by withholding
his signature! The report was signed in behalf of the committee by John Shumway,
chairman. Fifteen toasts were then given out. "Renovated France"
and "Desolate Poland" received due attention. The eighth toast, "Citizen
Moses Robinson, senator of the United States," will indicate how badly our ancestors
were afflicted with the prevailing political disease. We can perhaps imagine
what the members of the militia who were so unfortunate as to be federalists
thought of this method of celebrating the battle of Bennington.
On the 16th of August, 1798, the citizens of Manchester
and vicinity gathered for a similar celebration. At four o'clock they
walked in procession from Pierce's tavern (where Mrs. Hoyt now lives), to the
Court House, and listened to a spirited oration. The procession then formed
again and returned to the tavern, where the usual number of toasts were drunk.
The contemporary account of the celebration would lead one to suppose
that the closing proceedings were distinguished only for quiet and dignified
enjoyment; but the late Judge Pettibone was a youthful
54
and curious observer of the ways and manners of his elders on that occasion,
and from some reminiscences which he once gave me, I am inclined to think it
was what would be considered in these days rather a lively and boisterous time.
Several familiar and honored names now appear
in the history of our town. As early as 1796, Robert Pierpont, an uncle
of the present chief justice of our supreme court, became a resident of Manchester.
He kept an inn where the Rev. Dr. Wickham now lives, and was a prominent and
influential citizen. Dr. Ezra Isham came here from Litchfield, Connecticut,
about 1798, and soon became the leading physician of this vicinity. Previous
to 1812 he lived a short distance south of the residence of Malcolm Canfield,
in a building recently demolished. The later discoveries in medical science
have not entirely done away with his practice, for some of his prescriptions
and maxims are still current among the elderly people of the town. In
1795, Joseph Burr, the founder of our seminary, was trading in a building which
stood about where William B. Burton now lives. Before 1800 he removed
to the lot now occupied by the residence of E. J. Hawley, where he passed the
remainder of his business life and accumulated the greater part of his property.
In 1800, Richard Skinner moved into town, and soon became prominent as
a lawyer and citizen. His successful and honorable public career belongs
to a later period than that of which I speak.
The fourth of March, 1801, the day of the
first inauguration of Thomas Jefferson, was celebrated in Manchester by the
raising of Thaddeus Munson's new inn, the building which is now the north part
of the Taconic House. Those acquainted with the custom of the times can
imagine what
55
a crowd of people and what a quantity of rum it took to raise it. It
was then considered the largest and finest hotel in Vermont, and the day on
which its massive timbers were uplifted long held its place among the great
days of the town.
This building, comparatively modern as it is,
has witnessed scenes which we are accustomed to associate with our earlier New
England history. At the time of its erection; the old Puritan methods
of punishment were still in vogue, although thoughtful men had long questioned
their good effect upon the public morals. The whipping-post stood on the
west side of the street, nearly in front of the north side of the Equinox House.
About 1803, occurred an instance of punishment there, of which some of
the particulars have been preserved. The sentence was thirty-nine lashes,
and was partly executed by Gen. Robinson, the high sheriff, and partly by Ephriam
Munson, deputy sheriff. Sheriff Robinson struck his blows with surprising
regularity, and it was remarked among the spectators that he must have had considerable
practice. His less experienced deputy was quite excited and made bungling
work of it. Three or four years later another person was tied to that
post for punishment -- probably the last occurrence of the kind ever witnessed
in Manchester. There is at least one lady now living in the village who,
on that occasion, went out with childish eagerness to see the whipping, and
fled with cries of horror when the lash first descended on the quivering flesh.
The pillory was located on the east side of the street, a little south
of the present court house. It was standing there during the first decade
of our century, and was still in use as an instrument of punishment. On
one occasion, a woman
56
stood for hours in this pillory, in the presence of a great crowd. Within
the memory of the late Judge Pettibone, the sheriff cropped and branded a convict
in front of the Allis tavern. The victim was placed standing on the horse-block,
and his head tied to the signpost. Then the sheriff cut off the lower
portion of his ears, and threw the pieces under his feet. Meanwhile an
assistant had been leaning over a kettle of coals, blowing its contents into
life, and heating the iron brand. This the sheriff now took, and branded
the culprit on the forehead. That winter it was a favorite amusement of the
school boys to try some of their number for imaginary offenses, and brand them
on the forehead with wooden letters, the imprint of which would remain some
time.
Before concluding this sketch, it will be necessary
to trace the early progress of a section of the town which after the close of
this period became the site of a large and prosperous village. Soon after
the settlement of Manchester, Timothy Mead became the owner of nearly all the
land on which Factory Point is situated. His house was located where the
Colburn House now stands. He built a saw-mill on the water-power near
by, and afterwards a grist-mill; and the locality became known as "Mead's mills."
His grist-mill was the first in town, and was located a little below where
the present grist-mill stands. The saw-mill was a short distance above
it, on the same side of the stream. Sometime after this, Mr. Mead erected
a fulling-mill on the ground now occupied by the factory buildings. He
also built a store about where Howe's block stands, and Joel Pratt traded there
57
before 1800. Mr. Mead's son Jacob, a blacksmith by trade, lived near
where Mrs. Cloney's house is situated.
Mr. Mead was decidedly averse to selling any of
his land, and his policy in that, particular greatly retarded the development
of the place. The committee for the location of county buildings proposed
to place the court house and jail about where the present Baptist meeting-house
stands; but Mr. Mead met their application for a building lot with an absolute
refusal, and is said to have given the committee his opinion of courts and lawyers
in terms more vigorous than polite. Soon after this, however, he made
his first and only exception, in favor of the Baptist society -- the religious
organization with which he was most in sympathy. With his permission and
assistance that society erected its first house of worship on his premises,
close to his east line. In 1791, he conveyed to the society the land on
which it stood, and Isaac and Jeremiah Whelpley, who owned the J. B. Hollister
farm, and Timothy Soper, the owner of the lot just north, conveyed land adjoining
the meeting-house lot for a burial place. The site of the old meeting-house
can readily be located on the westerly side of the present cemetery grounds.
The road on which it stood was then the main highway; the street past the Episcopal
church not being in existence until long after.
Mr. Mead died in 1802. His real estate was
divided among his children, and soon passed into other hands. But the
early growth of the place was slow, and in 1812 it could scarcely be called
a village. The old grist-mill, and the fulling-mill, were still in operation.
The original sawmill had done its work, and been succeeded by another
on the opposite side of the stream, about where the west end
58
of the tannery stands. The store building was no longer occupied as such, and had been used as a school room while the first school-house of the district was being erected. Where J. T. Beach's wagon shop is located stood a distillery, which was visited altogether too frequently by many of our citizens. Adjoining it was the carding-mill of Chester Clark. Benjamin Mattison, the owner of the saw-mill and falling-mill, lived in the Timothy Mead house. James Borland, who run the grist, mill and leased the distillery to other parties, lived in a house which stood just east of the old store building. The dwelling-house nearest the mills, on the road leading to the village, stood on the top of the hill, south of the present residence of Deacon Burritt. On the road towards Dorset, the first dwelling was that of William Smith, where the Lester house now stands. On the south-east corner of Andrus Bowen's lot stood a blacksmith shop. A few rods east of the residence of A. G. Clark, was a good sized house, usually occupied by two families; and a little further on was a house of smaller size. The Jacob Mead house was then occupied by David Brooks, who was about building a tavern on the lot now owned by Mr. Adams. The next building was the Baptist meeting-house -- an edifice of moderate size, divided in great square pews, and embellished with a sounding-board. The society was then in charge of Elder Calvin Chamberlain, a revolutionary pensioner, and a man of great influence among the Baptist churches of the state. Just beyond the meeting-house, at the north-east corner of the burying-ground, stood the district school-house. About on the spot where Joseph Lugene, Jr., has recently erected a house, lived Peletiah Soper, one of the old settlers. Near the site of the Dea-
59
con Ames house stood a small store, in which James Whelpley traded, and just
north of it was a dwelling. Imagine these few scattered buildings, partially
surrounded by a dense forest at no great distance, and you have the Factory
Point of 1812.
But in 1812 a great public improvement was in
progress which indicated the growing importance of this locality to the inhabitants
of other sections of the town. This was the construction of a road direct
to Manchester village from the point where the old road turned west to the Noble
J. Purdy place. It had long been considered impracticable to build a road
across the swampy lands of the glebe, and its construction marks a new era in
the improvement and prosperity of the town.
In 1812, Manchester village had about one-third
as many buildings as now. The most northerly house was the Munson homestead,
then occupied by the widow and children of Rufus Munson. Where the Congregational
church lifts its tall spire, stood the first meeting-house, unpainted, and without
steeple or ornament. Its pulpit was then occupied by Rev. Abel Farley,
who lived just south of the present residence of Chauncey Green. At the
southwest corner of the old burying-ground, was the district school-house, and
nearly in its rear stood a blacksmith shop. Anson Munson kept tavern in
the lower part of the court house building; and in the court room in the upper
story Rev. Mr. Brownson, an Episcopal clergyman of Arlington, held services
every other Sabbath. Nathan Brownson, who had formerly been a merchant
in the place, lived a little south of the court house building. Anson
J. Sperry lived on the premises recently occupied by L. C. Orvis, and had a
law office just south of his resi-
60
dence. Joshua Raymond kept tavern at the Allis stand; and the old lodge room was occupied by the select school of Miss Harris -- an institution extensively patronized by the young ladies of Manchester and vicinity. Samuel Raymond traded in a store which stood where Mrs. Lawrence now lives, and Joel Rose lived on the premises occupied by the residence of Deacon Black. Mrs. Woods' place was then occupied by Elijah Hollister and his son Marinus, who drove the stages between Bennington and Rutland. The S. A. Millett place was owned by Archibald Pritchard, and about where E. D. Cook lives was a small house, occupied by Phineas Peabody. Capt. Samuel Walker lived in the little house which is still standing opposite J. A. Munson's; and Dr. Elijah Littlefield had recently built, and taken possession of, the house now occupied by George Stone. Deacon Asa Loveland lived where Noah P. Perkins now does, and the Hoyt place was then the tavern stand of Israel Roach. Serenus Swift lived and had an office at the Elm House place, and just north of it was the law office of Cyrus A. Lockwood. Joseph Wells was then trading at the Burr stand, but Mr. Burr retained an office in the building for his general business. John C. Walker, a young lawyer, occupied the E. B. Burton place, and had an office on the north side of his lot. Calvin Sheldon lived in the house now owned by Rev. James Anderson, and his law office is still standing south of that building. Capt. Peter Black kept an inn where Rev. Dr. Wickham resides, and also traded in a store which stood on the south side of his lot. Where Major Hawley now lives, was the residence and law office of Richard Skinner, among whose students at that time were Leonard Sargeant and Robert Pierpont. Nathan
61
Burton, who bad been appointed postmaster in 1808, lived where Mr. Miner does,
and kept the post-office in a little building on the north side of the lot.
Joel Pratt, the county clerk, lived on the premises now occupied by Mr.
Cone, and had an office adjoining his house on the north. The old Marsh tavern
was still standing, tenantless, and soon to be demolished. Thaddeus Munson
lived in the new tavern by its side, but kept it open only in court time.
Ephraim Munson lived on the premises now occupied by Mr. Shattuck. This
was the extent of Manchester village in 1812.
In the year 1812, war was declared against England;
the northern frontier was again threatened; and another generation of our citizens
rallied for its defense. For two years the drum of the recruiting officer
sounded in our street, and successive squads of volunteers and militia went
through their maneuvres on the green. Abram C. Fowler, the village school-master,
exchanged the ferule for the musket, and won a commission in the regular army
by his bravery at the battle of Plattsburg. John C. Walker left his law
office, and James Whelpley his store. John S. Pettibone, Joseph Burton,
Leonard Sargeant, and Benjamin Munson, were among the younger recruits. Of
the thirty-four citizens of Manchester who served in that war, the two last
named are still with us. Two of their associates have mouldered under
the sod of the battle-field now sixty years and over. Daniel Olds, a grandson
of Gideon Ormsby, was killed in a skirmish at Chateaugay. John Harris,
a private in the regulars, fell in the desperate night-battle at Lundy's Lane.
62
I have now sketched the history of Manchester down to a time when the names
of men still living appear upon her roll of honor. I doubt not there are
some of my hearers to whom the later delineations of this evening have seemed
but the feeblest hint of familiar things. There are doubtless those present
who can see the little village of 1812 with clearer vision than they can the
statelier village of to-day. It is not impossible for them to people the
town again with the men and women who then filled its borders with bustling
life. From this time on, their memory will supply a fuller history than
I have been able to give of the earlier days.
I have spoken of the first half-century of our
history -- a period worthy a more extended and minute recital. But, incomplete
as my presentation of the subject has necessarily been, I trust it has proved
sufficient to satisfy you that, in proper hands and with suitable preparation,
it would be a theme of uncommon interest. In tracing the early progress
of the town, I have dwelt with some particularity upon its relation to revolutionary
history -- as seemed meet in these centennial times. While listening
to the fragmentary accounts of that period, it must have occurred to you that
the citizens of Manchester have been exceedingly remiss in preserving the names
and exploits of those whom every sentiment of justice, patriotism and local
pride, should have led their to hold in perpetual honor. Let us, to whom
has fallen the hundredth anniversary of their valiant deeds, do what we can
to supply the deficiency before it is quite too late. Perhaps, in doing
tardy justice to the heroes of our first war, we may establish a local sentiment
which will renew its strength with each succeeding generation, and long suffice
to secure the grateful
63
remembrance in after times of those who do good service for the town.
Already the landmarks of that era are fading in
the distance. The voices of the fathers come faintly to our listening
ears. Time has carried us almost beyond sight and sound of the primitive
days. And yet, this period, which to most of us seems so remote, is scarcely
beyond the infancy of some who still hold their places in the ranks of the living.
But the life of the most favored individual is brief when compared with the
probable duration of the community of which he is a part. We who now compose
the corporate body will soon pass away, but the municipality may fulfill her
thousand years. In that distant future, the space which separates us from
the days of settlement will seem as nothing, and we who now commemorate the
early history of the town will ourselves be reckoned among its early inhabitants.
Our individual names may fail to reach our successors of that day; but
let us hope that our united efforts may secure for the time in which we live
the reputation of an age of public spirit and gentle manners as long as the
town shall endure.